Mother and son on construction site
CARE Aware Leadership System · Crib Shift

You have the opportunity
to change the lives of
parents in construction.

Pregnancy and parental leave is the moment the industry loses women who could be leading it. Your role in what happens next is more significant than most managers realise.
Start reading →
50%
of women in construction do not return to work following parental leave.
Galea et al. (2018), as cited in NAWIC Parental Leave Research Literature Review (p.11)
What this is about
This isn't a policy exercise.
It's a leadership one.

Construction loses experienced women at the moment they've accumulated real credibility, site knowledge, and relationships. Pregnancy and parental leave is when that expertise walks out the door — not because women choose to leave, but because returning is harder than it has to be.

The research is clear: the manager relationship is the single most powerful predictor of whether a woman returns. Not the policy. Not the HR process. You. This system is built to help you show up at that standard.

Woman in hard hat with child on construction site
Inside this system
The full system, at a glance.
Use what you need, when you need it. Every section works independently — come back as phases shift.
The four pillars at the heart of the system
C
Connect with Courage
Build the relationship where truth can be told
A
Address Assumptions
Interrupt bias before it shapes a career
R
Redesign the Environment
Make the site work for the people actually on it
E
Elevate
Invest in their career — return is the beginning, not the catch-up
The six-phase leadership arc — from disclosure to stabilisation
Building the case — start here if you want the research behind it
Crib Shift · CARE Aware Leadership System
01 · In 60 Seconds
The Case for Change
What this section does
Moves the problem from the industry to your team — and puts you at the centre of the solution.
This is not a pipeline problem.
Women are already here. The exit happens at one specific, predictable moment — the First 1000 Days. That moment is inside your control.
Policy is not the answer. You are.
68% of working mums say their manager and workplace culture is the biggest factor in making their return to work experience easier or harder. Not HR. Not the parental leave policy. You.
Most damage is accidental.
The managers who lose talented women are rarely unsupportive. They're underprepared — operating without a framework in a moment that demands one.
"
There wasn't really a framework or guidance. It just depended on who your manager was.
— Construction professional, NAWIC research, University of Sydney, 2025
One question
Who on my current team — or in the last two years — might this data be describing?
One shift
Before your next team meeting, check who in your team is pregnant, on parental leave, or recently back. If you don't know — that's the shift. Find out.
Crib Shift · CARE Aware Leadership System
01 · The Context
The Case for Change
What is happening to mothers in construction — and why leaders are the turning point.

Right now, across your projects and teams, something predictable is happening — and going unmanaged. Women who are skilled, experienced, and invested in construction careers are leaving the industry at exactly the moment they become mothers. Not because they have stopped caring about their work. Because the system makes it too hard to stay.

This section lays out the scale of that loss — in data, in dollars, and in human terms. It is not designed to assign blame. Most managers who lose talented women during this transition are not unsupportive people. They are underprepared leaders in an industry that has never given them the tools for this moment.

That is precisely what this toolkit changes.

01
The Scale of the Problem
Construction has a retention problem — not a pipeline problem.

The industry has spent years and significant resources recruiting women. Campaigns, partnerships, scholarships, outreach. Yet women represent just 22% of the construction workforce in Australia — and that figure includes office-based roles. On-site, women remain a rare exception.

The most common exit point for women in construction is not a dramatic incident. It is a quiet, predictable sequence: pregnancy, parental leave, and return to work. What this toolkit calls the First 1000 Days.

36%
of women in construction experience pregnancy discrimination — the highest rate of any Australian industry.
NAWIC/Hamilton et al., 2025, University of Sydney
22.4%
are made redundant, restructured out, or have their contract not renewed around the time of parental leave.
NAWIC/Hamilton et al., 2025, University of Sydney
22%
of returning mothers had a structured re-entry plan. The rest return improvising — alone.
NAWIC/Hamilton et al., 2025, University of Sydney
91.8%
of women experienced discrimination during their return-to-work phase — the highest rate across all phases of the parental journey.
National Review, Potter et al., 2024, UniSA
60%+
of new mothers returning to work said their opinions were ignored, they felt excluded, and were given unmanageable workloads.
National Review, Potter et al., 2024, UniSA
31.8%
median gender pay gap in construction — one of the highest of any Australian industry. Men are 78% of the sector.
WGEA, 2024

These are not edge cases. They are structural patterns playing out right now — on your projects, in your teams. When more than one in three pregnant women in construction experiences discrimination, we have to assume this is happening in every organisation, including yours.

When a mother leaves construction, she rarely changes companies. She leaves the industry entirely. In a sector already facing a critical skills shortage, that is not an attrition problem. It is a compounding crisis — one that begins with the First 1000 Days.

Retention is not just cheaper than recruitment. It is the only sustainable path to gender balance in construction.

02
Why This Is a Leadership Issue
Policies do not retain women. Managers do.

Most companies point to their parental leave policy as evidence they are doing the right thing. Policies matter — but they are not what determines whether a woman stays. Research is unequivocal on this point:

68%
of working mums cited their manager and workplace culture as the biggest factor that can make their return to work experience easier or harder.
The Future of Working Motherhood Report, Executive Moms

In research across the NSW construction industry, many women were the first person in their workplace ever to take parental leave. Their managers were not unsupportive — they were underprepared. They had no prior experience to draw from, no playbook, no instinct for what good leadership looked like in this moment.

The result was not discrimination by design. It was a leadership vacuum — and nature filled it with the default: silence, assumption, and drift.

The most damaging manager behaviours during this transition are rarely overt. They are:

Silence
Avoiding conversations about pregnancy or return because it feels awkward or legally risky. She reads this as: my manager doesn't know how to handle this. I should start planning my exit.
Assumptions
Deciding on her behalf that she won't want a challenging project, a promotion, or interstate travel — once pregnant or back from parental leave. Career decisions made for her, without her.
Invisibility
Failing to stay in contact during parental leave. More than 50% of women on parental leave were not told about workplace changes affecting their role. Out of sight becomes out of the pipeline.
Rigidity
Treating flexible working requests as personal accommodations rather than legitimate performance tools — flexibility on paper that doesn't translate into practice.

None of these behaviours require bad intent. They require only the absence of preparation. Managers are not failing because they do not care. They are failing because no one has ever shown them what good looks like.

40%
of mothers left a role or employer after having a baby due to lack of support.
Executive Moms, The Future of Working Motherhood, 2026
65%
of mothers who left their job did so within the first year post-return — the window this toolkit directly addresses.
Executive Moms, The Future of Working Motherhood, 2026
97%
said they would stay longer at a company that meaningfully supports working mothers.
Executive Moms, The Future of Working Motherhood, 2026

"There wasn't really a framework or guidance. It just depended on who your manager was."

— Construction professional, NAWIC research

Leadership during this transition is not about being perfect. It is about being present, proactive, and human. This toolkit gives you the framework, the language, and the timing to do exactly that.

03
The First 1000 Days — Six Phases
Pregnancy, parental leave, and return to work are not a single event. They are a 1000-day journey.

Most maternal attrition is not sudden. It accumulates across these phases, decision by decision, conversation by conversation — or the absence of them. Understanding the shape of this journey is what allows you to act with precision rather than guesswork.

Phase 01
Disclosure
Weeks 1–2 after telling you
She is at her most vulnerable. The first response sets the tone for everything that follows. Trust is built — or broken — in this single moment. Silence or awkwardness is read as: my career is already being written off.
Phase 02
Pre-Parental Leave
Remaining months of pregnancy
Career sidelining begins — often quietly, often with good intentions. Reduced scope, removed from key projects, excluded from decisions. She is watching what she is given, and what is taken away. 21.6% of pregnant women had their job role altered without consent.
Phase 03
Parental Leave Period
While she is away
Out of sight, out of pipeline. More than 50% of women on parental leave are not informed of workplace changes affecting them. The manager who stays in appropriate contact during this period is exceptional — and she will remember it.
Phase 04
Pre-Return
4–6 weeks before she comes back
Return is treated as a logistics exercise. The role is ready. She is not. Anxiety about professional identity, childcare, and how she will be received is peaking. Almost one in five women returning from parental leave were refused flexible working requests.
Phase 05
First 90 Days Back
Return through the first three months
The highest-risk window for attrition. She is managing new childcare arrangements, sleep deprivation, identity shift, and performance pressure simultaneously. 91.8% of mothers experience discrimination at this stage. Small, visible acts of support now have outsized impact.
Phase 06
Stabilisation
3–24 months post-return
She is finding her rhythm — but also recalibrating her ambitions. Leaders who engage her in meaningful development conversations now keep her long-term. Retention without progression is a delayed exit.

Every manager decision in the First 1000 Days creates impact at three levels simultaneously: individual, institutional, and systemic. You are not neutral in this system. You are the system.

04
The Real Cost of Losing Mothers
When a mother leaves construction, the loss is not a headcount number. It is a cascade.

And unlike most attrition, she usually does not change companies. She leaves the industry entirely.

50–150%
Cost to replace a mid-level professional
of their annual salary, including recruitment, training, lost productivity, and knowledge transfer time. For specialist or senior construction roles, this rises to 200% of salary.
$3.8B
Total cost Australian businesses lose to turnover annually
Employee turnover costs Australian businesses $3.8 billion per year — and construction has one of the highest turnover rates of any sector at 21% per annum.
31.8%
Construction gender pay gap — median
The construction industry has one of the highest gender pay gaps in Australia. Women who stay earn significantly less. Women who exit take this with them — and remember it.
53%
The motherhood penalty — earnings gap in first 5 years
Australian women's earnings fall 53% behind men's in the first 5 years of parenthood. A similar 47% gap persists for the first 10 years. Men's earnings are unaffected.

Investing in manager training, structured re-entry plans, and genuine flexibility for returning mothers does not require an outsized budget. It requires intention, preparation, and follow-through. The return on that investment — in talent retained, knowledge preserved, and culture built — is measurable and significant.

97% of mothers say they would stay longer at a company that meaningfully supports working mothers. They are telling you what they need. This toolkit tells you how to deliver it.
Executive Moms, The Future of Working Motherhood, 2026

The case for change is not moral. It is mathematical. Construction cannot afford to keep losing women at the point they become mothers. The industry that learns to support this transition will not only retain talented professionals — it will become the employer of choice for the next generation of leaders.

"Every mother who stays shows another woman it is possible. Every supportive manager creates precedent for the next team. What is good for mothers is good for fathers, for carers, and for construction."

Your commitment — Section One
The one thing I will do before my next team meeting
By when

Hamilton, M., Galea, N., Williams, A. & Hanna-Osborne, S. (2025). Building Better Workplaces: A Toolkit for Retaining Women Through Pregnancy, parental leave and return to Work in the NSW Construction Industry. University of Sydney / NAWIC.

Potter, R., Foley, K., Richter, S., Cleggett, S., Dollard, M., Parkin, A., Brough, P. & Lushington, K. (2024). National Review: Work Conditions & Discrimination among Pregnant & Parent Workers in Australia. University of South Australia (UniSA).

Executive Moms (2026). The Future of Working Motherhood 2026. Dallas, TX: Executive Moms.

Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) (2024). Employer Gender Pay Gaps Report 2023–24. Australian Government.

Bahar, E., Deutscher, N., Bradshaw, N. & Montaigne, M. (2023). Children and the Gender Earnings Gap: Evidence for Australia. Australian Treasury.

Australian HR Institute (AHRI). Employee Turnover Cost Data.

01 · Case for Change
Continue to 02 · In 60 Seconds →
Crib Shift · CARE Aware Leadership System
02 · In 60 Seconds
The Four Ms
What this section does
Names four forces already operating in your team — so you can finally see what you've been looking at.
You can't interrupt what you can't name.
Most leadership failure here isn't intentional — it happens in the gap between good intentions and a missing framework. These four concepts close that gap.
One of these will feel uncomfortable.
The Maternal Wall is bias dressed as kindness — decisions made for women rather than with them. Most managers who've done this didn't know they were doing it.
The section doesn't end where you expect.
M4 reframes everything before it. The attrition risk is highest at the point of least capability loss. That changes what retention is actually worth.
If we don't name it, we don't change it. We don't fund it. We don't study it. We don't support it.
M1
Matrescence
The developmental transition into motherhood. It has a neuroscience behind it that changes how you assess performance.
M2
The Maternal Wall
Removing a project to reduce her stress. Assuming she won't want the promotion. That's the wall — and it usually comes from good intentions.
M3
The Motherhood Penalty
A structural lifetime earnings reset that starts in the First 1000 Days. Employers shape whether it compounds or begins to reverse.
M4
The Maternal Asset
The commercially valuable capability built through caregiving. It only pays back if she stays — and she's most at risk of leaving when she's least at risk of underperforming.
One question
Which of these four forces is already operating in my team — and have I been seeing it clearly?
One shift
Pick one of the Four Ms. Use the word — even just internally — the next time you're watching a decision being made about someone on parental leave or recently back. Notice whether naming it changes what you see. That's the whole shift.
02 · In 60 Seconds
Continue to 02 · The Four Ms →
Crib Shift · CARE Aware Leadership System
02 · The Context
The Four Ms
Four concepts every leader needs to understand before they can lead.

Understanding the system you operate in changes how you operate within it. The four concepts in this section are not academic exercises — they are the invisible architecture that shapes every mother's experience in your workplace, including right now, on your current team.

Each of the Four Ms describes something real, measurable, and named. That naming is not incidental. It is the point. You cannot interrupt a pattern you cannot see. You cannot change a dynamic you have no language for. You cannot lead well through a transition that has never been explained to you.

Once you can see these four forces — once you can name them — you cannot unsee them. And that is where capable leadership becomes possible.

We have a word for adolescence. For menopause. For grief, for midlife, for retirement. We have entire industries of research, cultural frameworks, and institutional support built around every major human transition. Except one.

Matrescence — the developmental passage into motherhood — was coined in the 1970s by medical anthropologist Dana Raphael. It describes a transformation that is simultaneously hormonal, neurological, physical, psychological, and social. The word existed for fifty years before it appeared in the New York Times for the first time, in 2017.

Matrescence is not a metaphor. It is a documented neurodevelopmental period. Brain imaging studies show that pregnancy produces structural changes to grey matter that are morphologically comparable to those observed during adolescence. The same hormones that surge through an adolescent flood the maternal brain during pregnancy, driving changes to mood, memory, social cognition, and perception. This is not an illness. It is not a deficit. It is a brain being reorganised for a new and enormously complex task.

80%
of new mothers report significant cognitive and emotional changes during the transition to motherhood — yet most have no language to describe what they are experiencing.
Orchard et al., Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2023

The comparison to adolescence is clinically grounded — and socially revealing. Society has built entire support structures around the awkwardness of adolescence. The parallel holds scientifically. It does not hold culturally.

What we accept about adolescence
What we expect from matrescence
A developmental transition, not a dysfunction
Normal performance, from day one of return
Hormonal shifts as a recognised explanation for behaviour
Hormonal changes — but happiness and productivity are assumed
Brain restructuring as a reason for support
Adapting brain — but assessed against pre-change baseline
New identity forming — patience while it settles
Identity disruption — but the 'old self' is expected back immediately
Society adjusts; the individual is not expected to simply push through
The individual is expected to push through — alone

"The lived experiences of women go unspoken until the zeitgeist is ready to thunder."

— Dr Alexandra Sacks

If you use the word matrescence in a return-to-work conversation, you do something simple but powerful: you name the transition the woman in front of you is moving through. That naming creates permission to talk about it. That permission is itself a form of support.

While some women press their nose against the glass ceiling — many mothers never get near it. What stops them is the maternal wall.

Named by legal scholar Joan Williams in 2004, the maternal wall describes the discrimination and bias that working mothers — and even women perceived as future mothers — face in the workplace. It is triggered not by gender alone, but specifically by pregnancy, parenthood, or even the assumption of future pregnancy.

79%
less likely to be hired than equally qualified women without children — when the only difference on the resume is motherhood.
Correll, Benard & Paik, 2007, American Journal of Sociology
$11K
less offered in starting salary to mothers compared to equally qualified women without children — in the same hiring round.
Correll, Benard & Paik, 2007, American Journal of Sociology
24%
of women exit the labour market in their first year of motherhood. Five years later, 15% are still absent. The wall has a long shadow.
Child Penalty Atlas, Kleven et al., 2023
A manager who quietly removes travel from a new mother's role believes he is being supportive. He is, in fact, making career decisions on her behalf — without asking, without consulting, and without her consent. That is the maternal wall in practice: not malice, not intention. Assumption — and the action it produces.
Maybe Baby Bias
Employers offer less favourable contracts, fewer benefits, and more temporary roles to young childless women — simply because they are assumed to be pre-motherhood.
At Disclosure
Competence is doubted from the moment of announcement. Responsibilities are quietly reduced, framed as protection. She reads this as: my career is already being written off.
During Pregnancy
Removed from leadership-track projects without being asked. Expected to overperform to prove she is still committed. The bar rises as the support reduces.
On Parental Leave
Excluded from performance review cycles and bonus consideration. Not consulted on role changes. The professional world moves without her — and on return, she finds the landscape has shifted.
On Return
Assigned less interesting work. Considered unsuitable for management. Career advancement stalled — sometimes permanently, without anyone acknowledging it happened.
If She Succeeds
Highly successful mothers face a 'dominance penalty': rated as less warm and likeable when they demonstrate competence and ambition. Penalised in salary and promotion for it.
Ask Before Removing
Before reducing scope, removing travel, or changing responsibility — ask. "I want to make sure we're setting you up well. What would actually help you right now?"
Sponsor, Don't Just Support
Emotional support is necessary but insufficient. Active career sponsorship — advocating for her in rooms she is not in — is what counters the invisible forces working against her progression.
Audit Your Assumptions
Who are you not putting forward for the next project because you have decided they are not ready? Who have you mentally moved to a slower track? Is that their decision — or yours?
Name It With Your Team
When managers and teams can name the maternal wall, they gain language to interrupt it. Awareness of a cognitive shortcut is itself a partial corrective to that shortcut.

Before children, men and women in Australia track relatively similarly in earnings. After children, trajectories diverge sharply — and never fully reconverge.

Australia holds the number-one global ranking for women's educational attainment. Women in Australia enter the workforce at higher rates than women in many of the world's most gender-equal nations — including Sweden. Then motherhood arrives. And the trajectory changes.

70th
Australia's ranking for women's economic participation — down from 12th in 2006. The world's best-educated female workforce participates at one of the lowest rates among developed nations. The drop happens at motherhood.
Back of the Pack Report, The Parenthood / Equity Economics, 2021
$696K
additional lifetime earnings the average Australian woman would accumulate if she had the same post-child workforce participation as the average Swedish mother.
Back of the Pack, The Parenthood / Equity Economics, 2021
$180K
additional superannuation she would retire with under those same conditions — more than the current average total super balance of Australian women aged 50–54.
Back of the Pack, The Parenthood / Equity Economics, 2021
28.2pp
lower workforce participation for mothers compared to fathers when the youngest child is aged 0–5. This participation gap drives the earnings gap — not capability.
Back of the Pack, The Parenthood / Equity Economics, 2021

Australian Treasury research is clear: the earnings gap is not primarily caused by immediate wage discrimination. It is caused by reduced workforce participation, fewer working hours, increased part-time work, and slower career progression — all driven by the structural conditions mothers face on return.

You are the intervention. The conditions you create — or fail to create — during the First 1000 Days determine whether the penalty compounds on your watch, or begins to reverse.

Everything you have read in M1, M2, and M3 describes forces working against mothers in the workplace. This section describes the force working the other way — and why that asset only delivers if she stays.

What the research does not show is any evidence of reduced cognitive capability or lower output quality within working hours. The penalty is about hours and participation. Not performance. Inside working hours, something different — and commercially significant — tends to happen.

Prioritisation under severe time constraints
→ Strategic focus and output discipline
Task-switching across radically competing demands
→ Attention management and cognitive flexibility
Emotional regulation under sustained fatigue
→ Inhibitory control and composure under pressure
Risk anticipation and safety scanning
→ Decision speed and risk management in complex environments
Long-range planning with incomplete information
→ Resilience and scenario planning under uncertainty

These are not soft skills. They are the performance drivers that determine success in complex environments. They are, notably, exactly the capabilities that construction environments require.

You are not managing diminished employees. You are managing employees in the middle of a genuine neurodevelopmental transition — one that is simultaneously the highest-risk window for attrition and the lowest-risk window for actual capability loss. Retention at this moment is not charity. It is strategy.
The Four Ms — At a Glance
Four forces. One transition. One leader who makes the difference.
Summary — what it is, why it matters, what you do with it
M1
Matrescence
The developmental transition into motherhood. Hormonal, neurological, physical, psychological, and social all at once.
Without a name, there is no framework. Without a framework, there is no support — only expectation.
Name the transition. Use the word. Do not assess her against her pre-pregnancy baseline.
M2
The Maternal Wall
Bias triggered by pregnancy, parenthood, or even the assumption of future pregnancy. Usually comes from good intentions.
The bias operates before she is even a mother. It shapes hiring, scope, promotion, and sponsorship decisions — invisibly, unless named.
Ask before removing. Consult before reducing scope. Never make career decisions for a mother without her participation.
M3
The Motherhood Penalty
The structural earnings reset that follows children. Australia ranks 1st in education and 70th in post-child participation.
The penalty is driven by participation and hours — not capability. Flexible roles without structural redesign can entrench it.
Flexibility alone is not enough. Active career investment — promotion, review, sponsorship — is what prevents the penalty compounding.
M4
The Maternal Asset
The commercially valuable capability built through caregiving: executive function, output focus, risk anticipation, emotional regulation.
The attrition risk is highest at the point of least capability decline. You have already invested years building this person.
Retention without progression is a longer exit. Invest actively in her trajectory — not just her return.

Every mother who stays shows another woman it is possible. Every manager who leads well through this transition creates precedent for the next team. What is good for mothers is good for fathers, good for carers, and good for construction.

Your commitment — Section Two
Which of the Four Ms will I focus on first — and what will I do differently?
By when

Orchard, E.R., Rutherford, H.J.V., Holmes, A.J. & Jamadar, S.D. (2023). Matrescence: lifetime impact of motherhood on cognition and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(3), 302–316.

Carmona, S. et al. (2019). Pregnancy and adolescence entail similar neuroanatomical adaptations. Human Brain Mapping, 40, 2143–2152.

de Lange, A.G. et al. (2019). Women's brain aging: Effects of sex-chromosome complement and reproductive-related hormones. PNAS, 116(25), 12251–12258.

Williams, J.C. (2004, October). The maternal wall. Harvard Business Review.

Correll, S.J., Benard, S. & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338.

Kleven, H. et al. (2023). Child Penalties Across Countries: Evidence and Explanations. Child Penalty Atlas.

Bahar, E. et al. (2023). Children and the Gender Earnings Gap: Evidence for Australia. Australian Treasury.

The Parenthood / Equity Economics (2021). Back of the Pack: How Australia's Parenting Policies are Failing Women and Our Economy.

Hamilton, M., Galea, N., Williams, A. & Hanna-Osborne, S. (2025). Building Better Workplaces. University of Sydney / NAWIC.

Crib Shift · CARE Aware Leadership System
03 · The Context
The Other Side of the Coin
Why supporting fathers is essential — for families, for equity, and for a construction industry that works for everyone.

This toolkit began with mothers. It had to. But this program was never only about mothers. The decisions that drive women out of construction — the assumptions, the norms, the invisible penalties — are the same decisions that limit fathers too. Supporting mothers is good leadership. Supporting fathers completes the picture.

The Fatherhood Gap
What fathers in construction are experiencing
Men are experiencing this transition too — and the system is not built for them either.

When a baby arrives, fatherhood is treated as a side note. In most workplaces, the standard response to a man announcing his partner's pregnancy is a handshake and a joke. The profound identity shift he is about to undergo is invisible. This isn't just a personal oversight. It is a structural one.

3 weeks
Average paid paternity leave in half of countries with any paternity parental leave at all.
ILO
<half
of fathers take the full amount of parental leave they are entitled to, globally.
Promundo, 2019
77%
of partnered Australian fathers are in full-time work — the same rate as before having children.
ABS Census 2016
4–6%
of couple fathers in Australia work part-time to care for children — despite being legally entitled to request it.
LSAC research
46%
of Australian fathers report feeling always or often rushed or pressed for time.
LSAC research
When fathers carry work-family conflict, children carry it too. Fathers who had persistent high work–family conflict showed the worst outcomes across all domains — for themselves, their partners, and their children. When fathers were able to move out of work–family conflict, mental health improved for themselves AND their children.
Dinh et al., LSAC 2017 — 10-year longitudinal study of 2,496 fathers
The Four Fs
Four things every leader needs to understand about fathers
The same system that limits mothers limits fathers. The same leadership changes both.
F1
F1 — The First Concept
Patrescence
The transition into fatherhood that no one names
F2
F2 — The Second Concept
The Paternity Wall
The professional cost of being a present father
F3
F3 — The Third Concept
The Fatherhood Dividend
The family-wide return on involved fathers
F4
F4 — The Fourth Concept
The Intergenerational Cycle
What children learn from watching their fathers
The Both/And Case
What is good for mothers will be good for fathers
There is sometimes an assumption that supporting mothers and fathers are in competition. The evidence says otherwise.

The structural changes that help mothers return to work, progress their careers, and stay in construction are the same structural changes that give fathers permission to be present. Flexible work. Normalised parental leave. Managers who ask rather than assume. Teams where parenthood is treated as a phase of life, not a professional liability.

When mothers are supported at work

Fathers have more permission to share the load at home. The division of domestic labour becomes more equitable. Both parents benefit.

When fathers take parental leave and are present

Mothers return to work with more support. Postpartum depression rates fall. Family stress reduces. Children thrive.

When workplace culture normalises caregiving for men

The stigma around parental leave for both mothers AND fathers reduces. Everyone gains access to the same workplace flexibility.

When fathers model equitable caregiving

Their daughters aspire higher. Their sons engage more. The next generation enters the workforce with different expectations.

The How
What this looks like in practice
Concrete actions that support fathers — and strengthen the whole team.
Normalise paternity leave
Treat paternity leave as a normal professional event, not an exception. Ask when a team member is becoming a father, acknowledge the transition, and have a plan in place. The silence around fatherhood is not neutral — it is a message.
Watch for the Paternity Wall
If a father on your team takes parental leave and comes back to reduced opportunity, watch how the team responds. Stigma around male caregiving is real and often unspoken. Interrupt it with your own behaviour.
Make flexibility structural
A father who has to individually negotiate every school drop-off is in a precarious position. Build flexibility into team culture so that any parent — regardless of gender — can use it without career risk.
Ask the question you'd ask a mother
If you'd ask a returning mother how her transition is going, ask a returning father the same question. The transition is real for both. The care you extend should be consistent.
Model it if you can
If you are a parent, visibility matters. Being open about leaving on time for family, about taking your parental leave, about the reality of parenting, gives others permission. You don't have to share details. You just have to not hide it.

"Helping fathers get off to a good start when children are born will pay dividends later on, as patterns established early persist."

— Baxter & Smart, Fathering in Australia Among Couple Families With Young Children, AIFS

Every father you support shows another man it's possible. Every mother you retain proves that construction can work for families. This is the industry we're building. Let's build it together.

Your commitment — Section Three
One thing I will do differently for fathers on my team
By when

Baxter, J. & Smart, D. (2011, 2018). Fathering in Australia Among Couple Families With Young Children. AIFS.

Dinh, H., Cooklin, A.R., Leach, L.S., Westrupp, E.M., Nicholson, J.M. & Strazdins, L. (2017). Parents' transitions into and out of work-family conflict and children's mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 194, 148–158. [LSAC 10-year longitudinal study]

Promundo (2019). State of the World's Fathers. Washington DC: Promundo-US.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Census of Population and Housing, 2016.

03 · Dads Matter Too
Crib Shift · CARE Aware Leadership System
04 · The System
The CARE Framework
A capability framework for construction leaders. Not a policy. Not a checklist. A description of what good leadership looks and sounds like in practice.
For yourself
Read the capability definition. Be honest. Pick one behaviour to change. Come back in 90 days.
With your team
Use the Would / Would Not Expect to See behaviours in team conversations. Ask: which of these do we do consistently? Which do we quietly avoid?
In performance conversations
Reference the Framework when giving feedback on leadership behaviour — not just what was delivered, but how people were led through the parental leave journey.
For recruitment and promotion
Use the capability definitions to set expectations for what good leadership looks like. Make CARE behaviours visible in job descriptions and promotion criteria.
Alongside the Leadership Arc
When a team member discloses pregnancy or returns from parental leave, check the Arc for the relevant phase. Know the risk. Know what to do. Don't improvise.
If you have a relationship with someone going through pregnancy, parental leave or return to work — this framework is for you. The person closest to the situation carries the most responsibility. That's the point.

A leader who CONNECTs with Courage creates the conditions where a parent can tell the truth about what they need — and trust it won't be used against them. They initiate the conversations others avoid, stay present across the full parental leave journey, and treat every interaction as a chance to build or break trust.

Research shows that the quality of the relationship with a direct manager at the point of disclosure is one of the strongest predictors of whether a woman returns from parental leave at all. CONNECT is the foundation. Without it, nothing else in this framework works.

✓ Would expect to see
Reacts to a pregnancy disclosure with warmth — before logistics
Schedules a structured planning conversation within two weeks of disclosure
Agrees a communication plan before the employee goes on parental leave
Proactively tells them about anything that affects their role while on parental leave
Holds a pre-return conversation at least four weeks before they come back from parental leave
Has an honest career conversation before parental leave starts
Includes returning parents in forward conversations and succession planning from day one back
✗ Would not expect to see
Waits for the employee to make contact during parental leave and reads silence as contentment
Treats parental leave as an absence to manage, not a transition to support
Tells them about major role changes after the fact — or not at all
Confuses a handover conversation with a support conversation
Assumes HR or someone else is across the transition without checking
C — Self-reflection questions
When did I last initiate a conversation — not respond to one — with a pregnant or returning team member?
Do I know what every person currently on parental leave in my team actually needs from me right now?
Would someone in my team tell me the truth about how they're feeling — or tell me what they think I want to hear?
Am I the kind of manager someone would feel safe disclosing a pregnancy to on day one?
My honest answer
USE THE PLAYBOOK: Pregnancy Disclosure Conversation Guide · Leave Communication Plan Template · Structured Check-In Reference Card

A leader who ADDRESSes Assumptions catches the decisions they didn't know they were making — and changes them. They pause before talent calls, consult before changing role scope, and create an environment where others feel safe to raise concerns too.

Bias in construction isn't always intentional. It lives in decisions made at speed: who gets the stretch project, who's 'not ready yet', who was quietly passed over while on parental leave. You don't have to be discriminatory to make a biased decision. You just have to be busy.

✓ Would expect to see
Knows what is legally prohibited — removing someone from a project without their request, excluding them from pay reviews, changing role scope without documented reason
Flags team members on parental leave to HR for inclusion in performance, pay and bonus cycles
Keeps employees on leadership-track projects when they disclose — unless they choose otherwise
Pauses before any talent decision and asks: would I make this same call if they hadn't taken parental leave?
Puts forward team members within two years of returning from parental leave and ready for more
Speaks up in talent and succession discussions when assumptions are being made based on parental status
✗ Would not expect to see
Assumes someone on parental leave is 'out of the running' for stretch opportunities
Makes role changes during pregnancy without consulting the employee first
Treats flexibility as a favour they're lucky to receive, not an entitlement they can rely on
Uses parental leave as justification for a lower performance rating
Accepts 'not quite ready' or 'the timing isn't right' without examining whether parental leave influenced the assessment
A — Self-reflection questions
Have I made a talent decision in the past six months that I didn't pause to examine for bias?
Do I know which people in my team are within two years of returning from parental leave?
If I look at who got promoted, who got the stretch project, who got the pay increase — what does the data tell me?
What would it take for me to be convinced there's a bias problem in my team?
My honest answer
USE THE PLAYBOOK: Bias Interruption Decision Checklist · Performance & Pay Inclusion Tracker · Talent Review Bias Calibration Guide

A leader who REDESIGNs the Environment makes the physical site and the structure of roles actually work for people with caring responsibilities. A policy that says 'we support flexible work' means nothing on a site with no clean toilet, a uniform that doesn't fit, and a project schedule that didn't account for parental leave.

Under Australian WHS legislation, leaders carry a direct duty of care. This pillar is both the right thing and the legal thing.

✓ Would expect to see
Initiates a WHS risk conversation within two weeks of disclosure — reviews physical demands, documents what will be monitored
Has personally checked that clean, private, lockable toilets and appropriate amenities are accessible on site
Arranges a private, hygienic space for breastfeeding or expressing before the employee's first day back
Makes sure PPE and workwear actually fits — during pregnancy and postnatally
Builds the return-to-work plan around physical recovery and fatigue, not just hours and duties
Builds parental leave coverage into the project plan before it starts
Has actually redesigned at least one role for part-time or flexible delivery
✗ Would not expect to see
Waits for a formal complaint before addressing site amenity issues
Assumes the employee will raise any WHS concerns themselves
Treats the WHS risk assessment as a one-off form rather than an ongoing responsibility
Signs off return-to-work plans without checking whether physical reintegration has been addressed
Accepts 'that's just how construction works' as an answer to inflexible rosters or unsustainable hours
R — Self-reflection questions
If someone in my team needed to work part-time starting next month, could I actually make it work on this project?
Have I personally checked the physical amenities available to people on my site in the last six months?
Is parental leave coverage built into how I plan projects — or does the team absorb it?
What would I need to change about how this work is structured to make it sustainable for someone with caring responsibilities?
My honest answer
USE THE PLAYBOOK: Pregnancy WHS Risk Assessment Tool · Site Amenity Audit Checklist · Return-to-Work Fatigue & Reintegration Planner

A leader who ELEVATEs doesn't just support parents through parental leave — they actively invest in career progression on return. They know the difference between mentoring (giving advice) and sponsorship (using influence) — and they know which one is needed.

Retention without progression is just a longer exit. The 12 months after returning from parental leave is the highest-risk window for a parent's career — not because of a crisis, but because nothing is happening.

✓ Would expect to see
Builds a return-to-work plan that connects duties to career goals — not just a task list or hours arrangement
Flags the returning employee to the relevant people for the next promotion and pay review cycle — no informal waiting period
Revisits career goals and progression pathways within six months of return — initiates it, doesn't wait
Actively sponsors returning parents for at least 12 months — puts their name forward and uses influence on their behalf
Raises phased return as an option before the employee has to ask for it
Holds themselves accountable for where people end up within two years of returning
✗ Would not expect to see
Treats return from parental leave as a logistics exercise rather than a career moment
Waits for the employee to drive the career conversation rather than initiating it
Assumes they'll need time to 'get back up to speed' before being considered for stretch opportunities
Confuses mentoring (giving advice) with sponsorship (using influence on their behalf) — and stops at mentoring
Measures retention as success when people stay — without checking whether they're advancing
E — Self-reflection questions
Who in my team has returned from parental leave in the past two years, and what is their career trajectory right now?
What active step have I taken in the last 90 days to advance a returning parent's career — not just support them?
Am I their mentor (giving advice) or their sponsor (using my influence on their behalf)? Which do they need more?
Could I point to a consistent practice that produces progression for returning parents in my team — or is every good outcome an exception?
My honest answer
USE THE PLAYBOOK: Career-Linked Return Plan Template · 12-Month Sponsorship Roadmap · Maternal Retention Scorecard
Your commitment — The CARE Framework
Which pillar needs most work in my practice right now — and what will I do first?
By when
Crib Shift · CARE Aware Leadership System
05 · The System
The CARE Leadership Arc
Six phases. One continuous journey. This is what leadership looks like in practice.

The Arc begins at disclosure, the moment the manager enters the picture. From that point, every parent's journey follows a predictable sequence. So does the leadership failure that drives her out.

Most leadership frameworks stop at return. This one doesn't — because the data doesn't. The 12 to 24 month window is when the majority of maternal exits occur, not in the weeks after coming back from parental leave, but quietly, in the second year, when support has wound down and careers have stalled.

At each phase, the Arc tells you which CARE pillar is most critical, what the specific leadership risk is, what to do, what not to do, and what it costs to get it wrong.

01
Week 0–2 · PRIMARY PILLAR: CONNECT
Disclosure
Trust is built or destroyed in this conversation. There is no neutral.
02
Months before · PRIMARY PILLARS: CONNECT + ADDRESS
Pre-Parental Leave
Career sidelining happens quietly, with good intentions.
03
While away · PRIMARY PILLARS: CONNECT + ADDRESS
Parental Leave Period
Invisibility becomes structural. Out of sight, out of the succession plan.
04
4–6 weeks out · PRIMARY PILLARS: CONNECT + REDESIGN
Pre-Return
Return becomes a logistics exercise. The role is waiting. She is not.
05
0–3 months back · PRIMARY PILLARS: REDESIGN + ELEVATE
Return
Confidence dip meets stalled visibility. This is when most women quietly decide to exit the industry.
06
3–24 months post-return · PRIMARY PILLAR: ELEVATE
Stabilisation
Retention without progression. She stays — but she's going nowhere. And she knows it.
Phase
Pillar
The risk
If you fail
If you lead
01 Disclosure
Week 0–2
C
Trust is built or destroyed. There is no neutral.
Psychological withdrawal begins. Problems become structural.
She enters the journey trusting you. Most powerful retention factor you have.
02 Pre-Leave
Months before
C+A
Career sidelining with good intentions.
She leaves already behind. Damage done before she goes.
She leaves knowing her career is protected. Changes how she comes back.
03 Parental Leave Period
While away
C+A
Invisibility becomes structural.
She returns to a changed landscape and eroded confidence.
She returns informed, connected, ready. Return conversation starts six months early.
04 Pre-Return
4–6 weeks out
C+R
Return is a logistics exercise.
Burnout risk peaks. Preventable with 60 minutes of planning.
She returns with a plan. First 90 days: momentum, not survival.
05 Return
0–3 months
R+E
Confidence dip meets stalled visibility.
Silent attrition. Gone within 12 months. Exit survey says 'personal reasons.'
Confidence intact. Career trajectory visible. Retention increases sharply — if Phase 06 follows.
06 Stabilisation
3–24 months
E
Retention without progression.
Exits at 18 months. $200K+ replacement cost. No one connects the dots.
She is promoted. Every other woman on site is watching. Culture shifts.
Your commitment — The Arc
Which phase is a team member in right now — and what is the one thing I will do this week?
By when
05 · Leadership Arc
CARE AWARE LEADERSHIP SYSTEM · THE PLAYBOOK
Manager Tools
The engine room of the system. Pick up any tool, open it, and know exactly what to do — and why it matters.
07 · The System
CARE Practitioner Self-Assessment
An individual leadership mirror — not an audit of your organisation's policies. Score yourself honestly. Return every six months.
About this assessment

Use this self-assessment alongside the CARE Leadership Framework — not instead of it. The Framework defines the capabilities and sets the standard. This tool asks one question: are you actually living it?

Score 1 for behaviours that are fully and consistently in place in your own practice. Score 0 for anything partial, inconsistent, or only in certain circumstances. Consistency is the standard.

Each pillar scores out of 12. Total score out of 48. Your score reflects your practice — not your organisation's policies.

0–16 · SUPPORT

Every leader starts somewhere. Your focus: the disclosure conversation, your WHS obligations, and staying genuinely in contact across the parental leave journey. Trust is built in every interaction.

17–32 · SUSTAIN

You have foundations in place. The work now is making this consistent regardless of who's asking, how busy the project is, or how straightforward the situation feels.

33–48 · SPONSOR

You're leading this well — not common in this industry. The opportunity now is the reach of what you're doing. Progression not just retention. Sponsorship not just support.

YOUR SCORE
0
/ 48
C
0/12
A
0/12
R
0/12
E
0/12
LEVEL
C
Connect with Courage
Build the relationship where truth can be told.
Pillar score 0 / 12
A
Address Assumptions
Interrupt bias before it shapes a career.
Pillar score 0 / 12
R
Redesign the Environment
Make the site work for the people actually on it.
Pillar score 0 / 12
E
Elevate
Invest in their career. Return is the beginning, not the catch-up.
Pillar score 0 / 12
Your CARE Practitioner Score
C
Connect
0 / 12
A
Address
0 / 12
R
Redesign
0 / 12
E
Elevate
0 / 12
TOTAL
0 / 48
Three steps that move things forward
1
Name your growth area

Look at your lowest-scoring pillar. That's where the biggest opportunity sits. Pick one indicator, commit to changing your practice within 30 days, and tell someone you trust. Accountability makes it real.

2
Do one thing this week

Find an indicator you could act on right now. Do it. Momentum matters more than a perfect plan when you're building new habits.

3
Come back in six months

This is not a one-time exercise. Return at every major phase of a team member's parental leave journey — and formally reassess every six months. Progress, not a perfect score, is the point.

My lowest pillar and the one thing I will change within 30 days
Crib Shift
Crib Shift CARE Aware Practitioner Certification

This self-assessment is part of the CARE Aware Practitioner program, an individual certification for construction leaders who commit to building the knowledge, behaviours and accountability to support parents through pregnancy, parental leave and return to work. To learn more about how you can become certified please email samantha@cribshift.com

Based on NAWIC Building Better Workplaces (Hamilton et al., 2025, University of Sydney) · © Crib Shift
CARE Aware Certification
Welcome 01 · In 60 Seconds 01 · Case for Change 02 · In 60 Seconds 02 · The Four Ms 03 · Dads Matter Too 04 · The Framework 05 · Leadership Arc 06 · Playbook 07 · Certification